Mostly whimsy and drivel of no consequence. And CHEESE.
The other day I was perusing the Country Curtains catalog, which has “fresh window fashion for every style of home.” I’m not overly fond of “fresh window fashion,” but BeBe ate the temporary paper blind in my bedroom, and when they take the vines away to replace the window (I’m already making this a long story, but I’m attempting to cut it SOMEWHAT short) I won’t have any privacy. Granted, it’s the neighbor kids (who love to doorbell ditch, leave tricycles in the driveways and put themselves in varying degrees of danger by playing in or near the street) who would see me starkers, but I figure they have enough trauma in their lives.
ANYHOO, I was flipping through the catalog (because, as I’ve mentioned, my Mother receives ALMOST EVERY CATALOG IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD), mostly skipping through pages saying, “TOO frufru,” or “TOO Baroque,” or “TOO DAMN CUTSEY!!!”
To be fair, the same people have run this company for fifty years. And here they are:
I guess they have been involved in this endeavor long enough to take perfectly lovely pictures of windows and curtains. The things OUTSIDE the windows are another issue. The background scenes are very poorly photo-shopped in, and while most of the settings attempt to be lovely and pastoral, a few of them give the impression that a big ol’ tornado and the Wicked Witch of the West plunked the house right down in desert wasteland. And I swear one view is practically swallowed up by a field of poppies (POPPIES WILL PUT YOU TO SLEEP….).
I had pretty much given up on the Country Curtains catalog; I’m looking for a simple roman shade in a very neutral colour, not “Crinkle Voile,” “Anniversary Fringe,” or “Barrington: A Decorator’s Dream.”
Unexpectedly, something caught my eye. It had been on the “Cabin Check” page, so I’d turned past it rather quickly and was on the “Point d’Esprit” page, but I had to turn back because I realized that something VERY STRANGE was lurking outside the window festooned with “Cranberry tailored curtains on alabaster crane rods.”
No, your eyes do not deceive you, there is a FREAKIN’ BEAR outside the window! A LARGE, DANGEROUS URSINE CREATURE!!! It does seem to be sauntering away the window – perhaps it realized that the luscious-looking decorative fruits and pastries were made of wood.
Still, you must pardon my asking, what in the hell??? All I can say is that bear best beware (how’s that for alliterative festiveness), for Stephen Colbert (and RHYMING) always has grizzly bears ON NOTICE (and even if it’s not a grizzly bear he considers bears, in general, a menacing danger in our great Country, and he is, after all, “A JOURNALIST WITH GRAVITAS – WITH DIGNITY – WITH BALLS”).
Knowing that Stephen always has bears ON NOTICE, I can safely ponder other matters. Like, for instance, did they NOTICE the bear? There’s not an animal in any other picture (and you can be assured I checked) in the entirety of the publication. And, if they DID notice, did they think it was AMUSING? Or, rather, did they think that the lumbering bear beautifully captured the “Cabin Check” flair? Perhaps this shall just be one of life’s great mysteries.
*I’ll explain this another time. It still won’t make sense.
Jennette
September 13th, 2006 at 1:48 pm
I had thought that bears had moved from Stephen’s “On Notice” list to his “Dead to Me” list (along with Bowtie Pasta and CNN en Espanol), but in fact they still are just “On Notice”. I’m surprised at this. I would have thought that they’d be dead to him long ago. Then again if they are dead to him he can’t warn the rest of us about them on Threat Down.
Kate
September 13th, 2006 at 2:52 pm
The ON NOTICE list is from June 12th… And online they aren’t on the “Threat Down” right now. I miss the show too often. Please, if you hear definitively, let me know if they are “dead to him.”
Heather
September 13th, 2006 at 7:28 pm
We TiVo The Colbert Report every night and bears are definitely not dead to Stephen. He has to keep them alive so he can keep making jokes about them!
The funny thing is as soon as I saw the picture, I was thinking to myself, “Colbert should check out this catalog…”
Can I just use this forum to note how much I love and adore Stephen Colbert and how it was so adorable at the Emmy’s when Jon Stewart’s show won over Colbert’s and he said in the acceptance speech, “this year I really think you did make a mistake”?? And it’s true, Jon, it’s true.
Kate
September 15th, 2006 at 6:06 pm
We don’t have any of the fancy-schmancy devices such as this new-fangled “TiVo.” I still remember black and white television. Of course, it could be worse – my Mom remembers when they had that freaky pattern on the television when there weren’t any shows. They used to WATCH it.
In other words, I’m jealous.
Stephen Colbert makes me happy (he’s CRUMBELIEVEABLE, after all), but Jon Stewart still has my most CHERISHED affections. J’taime Jon!! It was NO mistake…
jenny
September 17th, 2006 at 1:36 am
DUH! Kate, can’t you tell that the bear is not alive, but is indeed one of those tacky silhouette-cutouts (like the lounging cowboy, the pointer spying a dead duck, etc., etc.).
I wish it were a real bear, though. How fun would it be having black bears running around your yard! THAT’D keep the tricycle-leaving, death-defying children from peeping through your vineless window.
(I know the ones you’re talking about—I see them on the way to my mom & dad’s. And they’re usually in some stage of undress. And there are dozens of them. And they almost always look like they’re about 30 seconds away from a trip to the emergency room.)
Kate
September 17th, 2006 at 10:30 am
Though I greatly appreciate the IDEA of the cardboard cut-out – especially since the children have become more bold. My Folks’ geriatric Maltese (Lark) got out the other day, I’m told, and they helped find her. Consequently, they showed up the next day, when only I was home, and rang the doorbell and rang the doorbell and rang the doorbell and rang the doorbell and RANG THE DOORBELL.
I wasn’t feeling good, so I hadn’t PLANNED on answering the door, but I figured it had to be them and I’d best go speak with them. And THIS time they’d OPENED the door. If that were to continue they’d be letting my Kitten Children out and I’d have a stroke.
They were there to see the “puppies.” I repeatedly told them we didn’t have any puppies. Finally, they said, “Bartholomew said we could come over and see the puppy.” (I believe we should all call my Dad “Bartholomew” from now on.) I finally realized they meant Lark; I told them she was a VERY old dog, NOT A puppy, and she was sleeping (all true). We had a discussion of dog versus puppy and the older girl insisted that you could call all dogs “puppies” – WHO AM I TO ARGUE. They weren’t very satisfied when I told them they’d have to see the “Puppy” another time, even though I’d admired the Unicorn AGAIN and heard the lion/panther toy roar, but OH WELL. Now we keep the front door locked all the time.
Don’t get me wrong, anyone who knows me will tell you I LOVE children, but my overwhelming concern for these children surmounts the idea of socializing with them. Once you’ve pulled a child so young that he can barely walk – he’s barefoot and wearing just a diaper and a shirt in the COLD – OUT OF THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET – well… Let me correct myself – by the time I’d seen him in the MIDDLE the street (and though it’s not a major thorough-fare, cars RACE down it) and sprinted out the front door he’d made it across and was coming back again. Then I found out that my Sister had pulled him out of the street, various neighbors had, and when I returned him to his Mother (I waited on the porch for about twenty minutes with his two or three-year-old sister who was “watching” him – she was distracted because she was playing with a small dog and a thirty-foot length of rope (?)) and his MOM had said they’d been pruning trees in the backyard and watched him do it, too. I’m just too scared for them to think we should “play.”
Ironically, the parents are nice enough people. And lest you think that we and all the other neighbors are negligent ourselves, people HAVE gently sat them down and TRIED to explain that there are ACTUAL DANGERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. It’s just that the mom thinks they live on a farm (as she did). They do not.
P.S. I do think it’s a REAL bear, but it’s a PICTURE of a real bear pasted in behind the window (like the out-of-focus pictures of the pine forests and whatnot in some of the other catalog images). And it still scares me.
Kate
September 18th, 2006 at 11:32 am
RANDOM OBSERVATION: The Fitzpatrick girl on the left seems to be cuddling a mummified baby. And she looks quite miserable about it. Perhaps she is jealous because her little sister got an ACTUAL LIVE CAT and all she got was a dessicated, mummified baby corpse. It would piss me off, too.
jenny
September 21st, 2006 at 12:07 am
Actually, both children in the photo look as though they’ve just seen something particularly gross on the ground. Like cat throw-up, or a big dog doo.
The one on the left looks like she’s cuddling a swaddled loaf of San Francisco sourdough.
terry
September 23rd, 2006 at 5:49 am
My first thought on seeing the family photo was that they’d all accidentally gotten into the movie The Ring.