Mostly whimsy and drivel of no consequence. And CHEESE.
Yes, I am always behind – sometimes by five minutes, sometimes by a few months – sometimes by YEARS (my window for becoming a professional athlete is GONE, I tell you). But you know I try to make amends (whenever the hell I get around to it, anyway). I’m serious. I’m still planning an entry about the Christmas holidays.
First, I’ll go with the CUTE little baby picture that I should have posted two months ago:
Noelle Claire K.
Born January 17, 2007
Sorry, Pam. Oh – and I suppose I should apologize to EVERYONE for the fact that I never get permission to post pictures of them or their progeny or their pets – whatever tickles my fancy.
And here’s a whole BATCH of cuties! My cousin, John, had joked with me quite a while ago that ALL THREE of his sisters and his Mother AND his brother-in-law had been featured in my “On the Lee Side” link. I pointed out that whereas they all had blog(s) he did NOT. I did say, though, that he should send pictures of his cute boys and I would post those:
Alex, Benjamin, John & Tucker
AND A Complete Stranger in the Background (He’s cute & also very nice, I’m sure)
So, if I’ve retained any of my Aunt Mary Ellen’s superb clarification of the “removed” versus “first and/or second” and so on when pertaining to relatives, John’s children are my first cousins once removed.
I must say, even though I have a somewhat better understanding of the concept, thanks to Mary Ellen, I must ask: Who came up with “removed?” And who or what takes them? And to where? I would say that from these same sibling cousins of mine that their offspring (I’m sorry, but the other side of the family is SO BIG – let me rephrase that – there are so many – that I cannot even keep track of my COUSINS let alone their children. THAT DOESN’T MEAN I DON’T LOVE YOU, B-side!) that perhaps they are “removed” because they all live rather far away.
BUT, that whole theory is RUINED because I did meet Harper, first cousin once-removed of lovely cousin Jennette and her most charming husband, Tom. Does that make her unremoved? Perhaps that’s how you become ‘TWICE removed – as they went home after visiting. That reminds me – I’ve got to figure out the whole tiny video thing from my phone because I have footage of Harper.
Ah ha! Plunder from Jennette’s website! Pictures of Harper and Elena – I guess they were visiting the West Coast from the East (Elena is the daughter of my cousin Heather, a distinguished barrister, and her husband Ammon, a distinguished professor – AND THEY ARE DISGUSTINGLY YOUNG AND I HATE THEM. In a nice way). Actually, j’deteste all four of you – you YOUNG SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE (yes, you too, Erica, even though you are too young to have a house and children – other than kitten children – and to be a barrister or the like). But in a NICE way:
Harper & Elena Play
Elena & Pizza
Come on, Urbane Intellectuals-
Where’s the macrobiotic gruel?
Heather
March 26th, 2007 at 3:23 pm
If it makes you feel any better, I hate my job and so does Ammon. In fact, we both hate our professions and most of the members thereof. So while we may be “young,” it is because we are young that we will both have premature mid-life crises and/or deathly illnesses brought on by work-related angst.
I should really bring Elena to Utah so she can be no longer removed from you (you may have met her as an infant – I can’t remember – sorry), but we try to avoid trips to the promised land. So it would behoove you to come EAST and see the lovely landscapes that Pennsylvania has to offer (read: bleak – at least at this time of year).