Mostly whimsy and drivel of no consequence. And CHEESE.
I believe it was the great Michelangelo – or perhaps one of the other Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (not to be confused with Teenage Mutant Kitten Children) – who said something about you should learn all your life or there is always something to learn in and/or from your life or life = LEARN, LEARN LEARN. Who knows, as it was originally penned in Italian (possibly Latin, if he was trying to be posh).
Okay. Truth? I’ve seen so many resin-cast-to-look-like-old-engraved-stone replicas sporting this motto in my Mother’s vast catalog collection that I would be unfair of me to say that I could not find the quote:
Ancora Imparo
Yeah – he was being grandiloquent. And if you’d like to know what it means, please refer to the title of this post. I was very clever and put it right out there so that people might think that I was writing about a substantive topic. I’m guessing everyone knew better.
Ah – so what is it that I’m still learning? Apparently EVERYTHING. Indeed, is it not the life aspiration of most people to try all new things when they are in their late thirties? Come on!!! There may be some of you who would forewarn me that this is leading me down a slippery slope and that I am in great danger of pitching headlong into danger and/or oblivion. I would answer, “That’s immaterial.” (Why am I quoting myself while writing in the first person? Why am I asking myself rhetorical questions?) As most people know, I am perfectly capable of toppling over, stumbling, falling on my substantial ASSets and/or taking a header WITHOUT any sort of impediment in sight. What’s more, I mean ON THE FLAT, DRY GROUND.
I believe it was dear Pamela who suggested perhaps I go back and embrace my “hippy” proclivities (something to that effect). Unfortunately, it’s simply TOO LATE. Vanity is involved, now; jeopardy has been attached (who watches too many re-runs of Law and Order (all flavours)? Pas moi!). How else would I end up with major chemical burns because of INVISIBLE PEACH FUZZ?
By the way, just because it takes me more than 450 words to get to my point does not indicate that I do not have one. To get down to the heart of the matter – the crux, the pitch, the gist, the nitty-gritty (dirt band – sorry), the thrust, the substance – the purpose of this entry is to discuss my eyes.
My eyes are hazel, incidentally. That is neither here nor there, but I’ve always described them as “khaki with an amber ring around the iris.” No, it’s not poetic (especially if you pronounce “khaki” the British and/or Canadian way – that is to say, “CAR-KEY”). Also, they seem different colours depending on what hue I’ve donned. I have “mood” eyes.
ALRIGHT! The point is I had taken my “mood eyes” for a long-overdue eye appointment. Luckily my prescription has not changed THAT much in the interim (and it’s long – embarrassingly long) because the last time I changed prescriptions I had also waited too long and I got new glasses RIGHT before a big trip, and the glasses made me dizzy for two or three days. This truly enhanced my motion sickness plight.
I do have a slight astigmatism now. It makes me feel more urbane (grant me these tiny delusions, please – I ask for so little). Wow. I just realized I’d have to look at my prescription to realize in which eye it is…
SOOO, in the spirit of Ancora Imparo I also was fitted with my very first contact lenses. I was excited at the prospect of seeing my eyes looking all deceptively naked and such. And I dreamt oh-so-fancifully about a ridiculously handsome stranger being able to now “fall INTO” my eyes – unimpeded by anti-glare lenses for the myopic. To be sure, I am not rich, but my fantasy life can be.
Sometimes I feel self-conscious because I am a neophyte at certain things at the ripe old age of – well, any state of “maturity” that can be prefaced with “the ripe old age” should be self-explanatory. In other words, I figured that I’d have a little difficulty putting the lenses in and when you see thirteen-year-olds pop them in and out blind and lubricate them with saliva (at least I know THAT’S stupid) and all that, I thought I’d feel “impaired.”
Impaired ended up being an understatement. A VAST, GINORMOUS (just recently made it into the dictionary – so there!) understatement. The doctor was extremely kind and helpful, but I was unquestionably handicapped at successfully getting contact lenses ONTO MY EYEBALLS. He finally had to do it for me, taught me how to remove them, and then let me try again. Seventeen hours later (SLIGHT exaggeration), I was successful. Of course my eyes were practically swollen shut and so blood-shot that it looked like I’d been on a three-day (maybe week-long) bender.
Here’s my problem: I blink. Excessively. This is why many a photograph (for which I deign to pose) catches me with my eyes closed. Also, I’m fairly light-sensitive, therefore I blink to excess in the sun. My eyes are vulnerable, delicate…creatures.
Don’t mistake me, some people have difficulty touching their eyes; this is indubitably not my problem. You know that expression, “It’s better than a poke in the eye?” I often disagree. A poke in the eye is NUTHIN’. Given the choice, I’d oft choose a poke in the eye over the alternative. Yes, I can touch my eyes – I’ll poke myself in the eye right now if someone asked. There are those who claim I have ELBOWED others in the eye (for the record, I was ASLEEP – and that whole incident is the definition of the phrase “alleged assault” – no cooberating witnesses, no physical evidence).
No, I’m just Blinky McBlinkster. Sometimes I get the lense in right off the bat, sometimes I practically push my eyeball clear back into my skull, pull my finger back, and see that the contact is still ON MY HAND. That’s when the sailor language comes in.
This made it rather difficult on the occasion that three of the four children we were babysitting watched me put my lenses in one day – fascinated by the process despite the fact that BOTH their parents wear contacts – perhaps it’s because I let them touch them (the CONTACTS – not my eyes – though they’d have probably done less damage) – never fear, I re-sterilized the things. But I had to keep it CLEAN – my “potty” mouth, that is.
I AM learning. But if you see me with bloodshot eyes it’s no doubt my doing – DIRECTLY AND PHYSICIALLY.
There is also an “eye-opening” aspect to this whole affair. (ugh.) Most of it has to do with luggage. I like to joke th
at I always carry too much luggage (and that’s not just when I travel, that’s a day-to-day crack I like to make because I embarrass myself by carrying fifty-two or three bags everywhere I go (yeah, yeah – but it’s no fun if I don’t embellish a LITTLE)).
This little quip hit me very profoundly yesterday (I’d started to notice, but OH, THE DENIAL) as I sat down to have my stylist trim my hair. See, when you TAKE OFF YOUR GLASSES for this procedure you are granted a fortuitous amount of “airbrushed” effect on your reflection. With contacts, you must STARE IN THE LOOKING GLASS WITH CORRECTED SIGHT. That’s when you know, deep down in your heart, that the “luggage” joke can rightly be applied to the immense bags under your eyes.
Having been blissfully unaware of and not requiring (I THOUGHT) “under-eye concealer” all these years, it’s disturbing that I’m contemplating it now. Maintenance is a bitch.
Brian
July 15th, 2007 at 4:34 pm
The lack of contacts might explain the bluriness of many of your photos. After all that is how you see yourself in the mirror. 🙂
Mic
July 16th, 2007 at 3:14 am
Hi Kate,
what happened to you?. I sent several emails to you, but no answer.
Mic…
Henrike
July 16th, 2007 at 8:23 am
Okay, here is my horror story concerning contacts- well, actually it’s my cousin’s, but either way, here goes:
Chris was riding his bike and got into an accident with a car- he was catapulted over the front bar of his bike and somehow the impact of his fall put the right eye contact lens in an awkward angle and actually damaged his eye, so he’s now almost blind on that eye. However, that happened when those lenses were fairly new and made out of different materials than they are now- so nowadays stuff like that can’t happen, anymore, so you’ll be fine – well, after you stop with the rapid blinking, that is!
Have a great day!
Oh, there’s an even better story from two brothers who were running with the bulls in Pamplona, Spain- and are now in a Spanish hospital- but will participate in the Philly Challenge next month. It was on the Today Show, and here’s the link:
http://video.msn.com/v/us/fv/msnbc/fv.htm??g=a713f44f-d243-409f-8623-2d684661976a
Henrike
July 16th, 2007 at 8:27 am
Sorry, the link was too long to appear correctly.
http://video.msn.com/v/us/fv/msnbc/
fv.htm??g=a713f44f-d243-409f-8623-2d684661976a
Hope it works, now!!
Kate
July 16th, 2007 at 8:35 am
Hey, Mic!
Sorry – next week is the short course I’m arranging for my Father, so I have a bunch of last minute work to do. I did sneak in and edit an article you wrote (not the letter – I thought you were just posting that one the way you sent it). 🙂
I’ll get back to you soon.
Kate
July 16th, 2007 at 8:54 am
Thanks, Henrike!
Thank you for the story and the video!
Thank you for the reassurance that I’ll be okay if I get into an accident with a car while riding a bicycle. Sorry about your cousin… Perhaps this is why I have not ridden a bicycle since I was about fourteen…
I’m glad that Dos Hermanos are okay – though I admit I number myself as one someone who doesn’t really comprehend running with the bulls. Than again, it has provided excellent promotional opportunities for the LIVESTRONG® Challenge in Philly. Perhaps there’s something similar that the LIVESTRONG® European Cycling Team could do…
Kate
July 16th, 2007 at 1:31 pm
Now BRIAN,
I only intentionally blurred the photos to point out the important features of a picture (and did so with Photoshop using one version or the other of my corrective eyewear). As for unintentional blurring, that had to do with the limitations of loading ginormous (lovin’ it), high-resolution pictures onto the web.
Come ON, Mr. Computer Man – how else do you post a large group shot? Dazzle me with your MAGIC!
Henrike
July 16th, 2007 at 3:18 pm
Hi Kate!
So you suggest for us to run with some longhorns- as the Austin Challenge will be in “Horns country”?
I thought the promotional aspects were pretty good, too- apparently we were wrong- at least party. The LAF got upset letters from people who watched the Today Show and thought that the LAF was supporting the Pamplona event. I can’t imagine how they reached that conclusion, but some obviously did. Hopefully people will remember the positive aspects, too. I guess you just can’t please everyone!
Amy
July 17th, 2007 at 11:10 am
hey cha kate! i would like you to poke yourself in the eye RIGHT NOW.
and again. AND AGAIN.
okay, now i’m just being evil, but do it again!!!
i’m done.
thanks!
lattegirl
July 24th, 2007 at 10:58 pm
You and I, who were such bosom buddies. What happened? Did we diverge so badly? Maybe on the surface, but really? Was I so bad for your image? Do I embarrass you?
Is all this learning going to take you away from people you once thought were almost sisters? I have not changed. Not a whit. I am still the loving yet completely fucked human I always claimed to be.
Don’t leave me behind, Kate.
Kate
July 25th, 2007 at 12:10 am
Don’t give up on me, My Sister Terry FOREVER.
I’m in the midst of the SHORT COURSE FROM HELL, Year Two, THE REVENGE, and have been in the throws of furious preparation for it.
P.S. And don’t be dissin’ on my corporation website. As it is for such a limited audience it didn’t really merit anyone to build who was more professional than, okay – ME. At least you can be pleased that it is not striped (please pronounce BOTH syllables), Terry.